Roll call of Spinozists Our socio-economic and socio-cultural environment is steeped in kabbalism, Freemasonry and Spinozism, making it almost impossible to escape, achieve freedom and full humanness. The process of individuation, the Absolute I, the arrival at the ‘I am I’, call it what you will, do not oppose assimilative Tikkun, they comply with it, they are it. Opposition to assimilative Tikkun is not individuation, the Absolute I or the I am I. To believe such a thing is to fall into the Spinozist trap. The whole alchemical way is a lie and its adherents, consciously or not, are the participants on one side of an unspoken global war that is routing a feeble and dehumanised opposition.
Looked at this way, the roll call of Spinozists, not surprisingly, sweeps up the whole socio-cultural, literary and philosophical canon of the West. The canon of ‘rebels’ duped by Luria’s rehashed kabbalism is long but, in my new enlightened context, a few of its members come randomly to mind: Jung, Nietzsche, Hegel, Locke, Berkeley, Baudelaire, Blake, Steiner, Marx and Engels, Heidegger and more, my own hitherto heroes and villains alike and yes, even Fichte, Coleridge and Gentile. T.S. Eliot himself summed up the Spinozist mindset of a journey of individuation, return and re-assimilation with the words:
We shall not cease from exploration And the end of all out exploring Will be to arrive where we started And know the place for the first time. (Little Gidding)
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
From the archive:
Devoid of Love
|
Just a thought:
Over the centuries since the contractual obligations imposed at Nicaea, the struggle for freedom has been synonymous with the struggle against the Jehovian Terror. Just as the Jehovian Terror supported the Diocletian Order so too did a reinvigorated Jehovianism give scientific and philosophical, as well as divine, sanction to the reinvented Diocletian Order, which followed the collapse of the Renaissance. John Dunn (Renaissance: Counter-Renaissance)
|